Ruger Talk Forums banner
1 - 20 of 41 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Looking for your opinion, please.
I have a Ruger LCP.
I've added the Hogue rubber grip.
I've added the red alloy Galloway trigger.
I've added the 13lbs Wolfe springs.
I've added the new rod as well.
And of course, the CT Laser.

With all that being said... Laser was like $70.00. Trigger was like $50.00.
Everything else was affordable.

If you were me, considering the redesign of the Ruger in the new Ruger LCP 2. Would you sell and obtain the latest model?
Or would simply be foolish, considering what I've put into this one?
What's your take?

Anyone staying put with the older model? Why?
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
551 Posts
It seems to me from reading and watching reviews of the LCP 2 that it's biggest advantage over the original LCP is the new model's trigger. Having owned a LC9 I was tempted to install a Galloway trigger in it. But before I got to that the Lc9s came out so I traded up to the S model. No regrets here, but I had nothing into the Original Lc9 other than the $220 I paid for it used. I sold it for the same price and only had to put about $125 to make up the difference for a new Lc9s. It was a good move because the trigger performance was so improved as to make it worth ever penny spent.

I don't recall reading about much benefit other than trigger performance when moving up to the 2. Of course I might have missed something. The 2 is still a hammer fired action not striker fired, so it might not be much, if any, better the original with a Galloway trigger. Maybe someone here has made that comparison in real life use.

Anyway, you do have a lot into your gun, and unless performance is a continuing issue, I can see no reason to upgrade. You might try selling the original model with the adaptations you have added. That would certainly bring more return than just the plain model.

It is about your satisfaction with performance. If you are happy with what you have and it works reliably, why change?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Buy the II and compare for yourself; they aren't all that expensive.
They are affordable.
I like the look of the new one better.
But I think I have a lot invested into mine, and I'd lose my bootay.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
It seems to me from reading and watching reviews of the LCP 2 that it's biggest advantage over the original LCP is the new model's trigger. Having owned a LC9 I was tempted to install a Galloway trigger in it. But before I got to that the Lc9s came out so I traded up to the S model. No regrets here, but I had nothing into the Original Lc9 other than the $220 I paid for it used. I sold it for the same price and only had to put about $125 to make up the difference for a new Lc9s. It was a good move because the trigger performance was so improved as to make it worth ever penny spent.

I don't recall reading about much benefit other than trigger performance when moving up to the 2. Of course I might have missed something. The 2 is still a hammer fired action not striker fired, so it might not be much, if any, better the original with a Galloway trigger. Maybe someone here has made that comparison in real life use.

Anyway, you do have a lot into your gun, and unless performance is a continuing issue, I can see no reason to upgrade. You might try selling the original model with the adaptations you have added. That would certainly bring more return than just the plain model.

It is about your satisfaction with performance. If you are happy with what you have and it works reliably, why change?
Well said, Sir! And I have $50.00 in the 7-round mag that doesn't work with the new model, also...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
OK, I spoke with two gunsmiths. Both told me to stay put. They said, like others have already mentioned, the trigger is better, but I've already corrected that with my upgraded trigger. Boom!
They said, unless the new version weighs half as much "it doesn't, ha" then no need to swap.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts
My brothers both own the LCP. I have the LCPII. I have shot both models extensively. Here is my take.

LCP II Pros.
More accurate
Better sights
Much better trigger
Doesn't sting the hand

LCP Pros
Lighter weight
More rounder
Better pocket carry

The difference that matters more to me is the grip design.
Wider through backstrap. It spreads the recoil over more of the hand.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
502 Posts
I have a Gen 2 of the original LCP. Changed springs, guide rod and added a grip sleeve. Also used glow paint on a toothpick to fabricate rudimentary sights. Terrible range pistol, but fits right in my front pocket. I love it and don't need anything different.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts
I happened to the farm a few weeks ago. Both my brothers were there shooting plates with their Magnum revolvers at 30 yards.

I was not planning on shooting that day and all I had was my LCP II. I had shot it some at the 15 yard line at the range I belong to and decided to give it a try.
Bang-Clang
Bang-Clang
Bang-Clang
Bang-Miss
Bang-Clang
Bang-Miss
Bang-Clang
All 5 plates down and I had a round left.

Priceless!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Keep what you got. It should shoot well, so what is to be gained with a trade-in?
Agreed! I realize that now. I've put too much money into this model.
It's not my "range gun" so it doesn't need to be comfy.
It just needs to be "there" when I need it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
My brothers both own the LCP. I have the LCPII. I have shot both models extensively. Here is my take.

LCP II Pros.
More accurate
Better sights
Much better trigger
Doesn't sting the hand

LCP Pros
Lighter weight
More rounder
Better pocket carry

The difference that matters more to me is the grip design.
Wider through backstrap. It spreads the recoil over more of the hand.

I appreciate you taking the time. I think the Hogue rubber grip may have solved that issue with my older model. The laser solves the sights, ha.
As long as the battery works.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
I have a Gen 2 of the original LCP. Changed springs, guide rod and added a grip sleeve. Also used glow paint on a toothpick to fabricate rudimentary sights. Terrible range pistol, but fits right in my front pocket. I love it and don't need anything different.
Nice image! Looks clean! I like the sights. Well done.
Giving me ideas. Not sure if I have enough room for that though.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
114 Posts
I happened to the farm a few weeks ago. Both my brothers were there shooting plates with their Magnum revolvers at 30 yards.

I was not planning on shooting that day and all I had was my LCP II. I had shot it some at the 15 yard line at the range I belong to and decided to give it a try.
Bang-Clang
Bang-Clang
Bang-Clang
Bang-Miss
Bang-Clang
Bang-Miss
Bang-Clang
All 5 plates down and I had a round left.

Priceless!
Gongworthy! :Cooltu:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
I just sold my LCP 2 yesterday,and went back to the original LCP. The trigger, slide lock, and better sites are good. The big problem I had with the gun is I could tell it was thicker, heavier, and a bit bigger when it was in my pocket. I had printing problems with all of my pants. This was never a problem with my old gun.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
I would shoot it first. But I love both of my lcp rugars. Do note. The trigger is much lighter. For example. I have 6 pocket 380's. Five of them have heavy trigger pulls. When I pick up the lcp2 at the range, the trigger is so light it sometimes goes off (while pointed at target etc) way before I expect. You get accustomed to the heavy pull, and the light lcp2 will surprise you.... possibly. But I do love it and can shoot it better than any of my pocket 380's.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
123 Posts
I just broke 600 rounds on my lcp 2 this evening. I love it. I had a few ftf/ fte's in the first 100 rounds. Now it is just a shooter. I used to own the lcp and carry it as a bug like I do my lcp2 now. It was ok, but I didn't really like it. I really like my lcp 2!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts
I just broke 600 rounds on my lcp 2 this evening. I love it. I had a few ftf/ fte's in the first 100 rounds. Now it is just a shooter. I used to own the lcp and carry it as a bug like I do my lcp2 now. It was ok, but I didn't really like it. I really like my lcp 2!!!
Did you say you like your LCPII? :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
907 Posts
Looks like the OP has a pretty sweet setup on his Elsie Pea. I'd keep it and save up for the Dos. No point selling yours.

I'd never considered the original LCP as a BUG because the trigger sucked, the sights were minuscule and the slide didn't lock back after the last round.

When I discovered Ruger had redesigned the LCP and fixed these issues, I was on it. It replaced my j-frame as my BUG.

Like Lucian, I love the II.

If I were you, I'd keep the yours and save up for the II. It's very reasonably-priced.

Trigger Font Gun barrel Electronic device Computer keyboard
Camera accessory Auto part Gun accessory Metal Trigger
Camera Camera accessory Digital camera Reflex camera Cameras & optics
 

Attachments

1 - 20 of 41 Posts
Top