Ruger Talk Forums banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Which one I heard the lc9s jams a lot and has problems with recoil spring assembly. Want for concealed and house.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,933 Posts
Im going to move your first post /question to Introductions,

and give you the opportunity to introduce yourself, tell all of us a bit about yourself.

I Welcome you to RugerTalk.

Im sure you will get answers to your questions here.


Jim
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
182 Posts
Welcome to the forum!

I would buy the Kahr CM9. But then I like the Kahr pistols. I also have a SR9c that I am very fond of.

I have no experience with the LC9s.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
907 Posts
I've not heard anything but positive reviews on the LC9s. Check out Hickok45...

http://youtu.be/Opx_IFm0iQU

I was never a fan of the non-S model because of the crappy trigger, but I'm liking this striker-fired version a lot. It's on my ever-expanding wish list.

I owned a Kahr a few years back. It was a decent gun, but I didn't care for the trigger - smooth, but numb. No detectable break or reset. Sold it to fund my first 1911.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,466 Posts
Welcome from Texas.

I know absolutely nothing about Kahr firearms, so I have no opinion to give on that subject.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Hey I joined the forum. I feel cool now. About me, well I like sky diving, eating deer, and dancing. :p I have about 100 different firearms and I like shooting them. I get to the range everyday. I am a hell of a shot. Other things about me...I like to get drunk a lot. Like it's a problem. I go to AA every other day. I am a mess.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,933 Posts
Dang.. you are one busy dude.:)

I personally have not heard of problems with the LC9S.




Jim
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,549 Posts
I was not impressed with Kahr as I often heard of owners having problems with new guns especially before the break in period was reached. I really don't care for any gun that requires a break in period. I am not about to trust my life with one. The Kahr brand usually costs more than a Ruger also. For the money IMO Ruger can't be beat for quality firearms. I haven't read anything on the Ruger LC9S. I did hear many liked the LC9 over say the comparable KelTec PF9. I sold my PF9 because it had totally failed to function with less than 200 rounds. KelTec repaired it but I sold it as soon as it did test fire ok. Any gun with common reported problems is usually not a fluke and I refuse to own a known problem gun. I learned that lesson with the KelTec PF9.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,482 Posts
Welcome!;) :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
I like the Lc9s

I bought a new Lc9s yesterday and took it to the range. No failures or mishaps. This is a good shooter and very accurate. I tried the Nano and it didn't work out. This is the first Ruger that I have owned, but have shot several rifles and pistols. So far I am very pleased. I do know that Ruger has a good reputation and backs their products. Good Luck with what ever you chose!
 

·
GPNP
Joined
·
4 Posts
I've had the LC9s since November and put 300 rds. through it. For me it feels nice in my hand and is comfortable to shoot. Since I am used to hammer fired pistols, it's taken a little adjustment to get used to the new trigger. So far so good. This is a beautiful gun and an ideal size for concealment in a holster on your hip or in a pocket holster. Just my opinion.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top