I was leafing through the internet and ran across a Guns & Ammo article discussing the difference between the Range officer/Commander vs. the full size SR1911. (Buster told me to quit buying the mag but I had to look at the net article). The author mentioned that the shorter pistol with a shorter site picture is harder to shoot than the full size Commander. (4 1/4" vs. 5") I think I am in agreement. Just that 3/4 " does make a difference (at least to me). I can see it when I go to the range. We have a short indoor range here (50 feet) and I have to make sight adjustments when shooting my Commander. It has the propensity to shoot a little lower than my full size. I would like to have your comments and thoughts on this article. The sights on both pistols are the same in all dimensions. Do you think it makes a difference?