Ruger Talk Forums banner
1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
57 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
It would seem I've been bitten by the revolver bug again. It was probably the new Pythons that got me wanting another revolver, but after hearing the issues they're having I decided to wait a while before picking one up. Meanwhile, I'm still here wanting another revolver. I THINK I've narrowed it down. I was torn between a S&W 686 and a GP100. I know. You can't go wrong with either. They're both fine guns. I've owned a GP100 3" Wiley Clapp blued (which I gave to my father) and loved it but I've never owned a Smith. I'm thinking I want another GP100. I considered buying another Wiley Clapp. Maybe this time the stainless model with fiber optic front sight? But then I thought maybe try something new. I don't want a 4" barrel revolver. My 1975 Python is a 4" so maybe I should go 6"? Well, when Colt gets the bugs worked out of the new Pythons I will pick one of those up in 6". Hmmmm, what about the 5"? I'm liking the idea of the 5". I have a single action that is a little over 5" and I like the balance of it. Not too short, not too long. So 6 shot or 7? Or should I just get another 3"? I have such a hard time with decisions like this. Please help me out with your suggestions.

My intended purposes are home defense and range gun. I do not plan on carrying it. I do plan on shooting the snot out of it. I miss having a GP100 in the stable. Or should I get the 686? Lol
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
324 Posts
Your right, that is a tough decision. Personally, if I were trying to make that one, I would be going with the S&W 686....not because it's better than the GP100, but just a personal opinion on the "looks".

Good luck on your quest! ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Last April, I purchased a 686 with a 5" barrel. Before that, I had used two different 1911's (45 cal) and a S&W 2.0 M&P .45 cal. for our bowling pin league. These were all brand new pistols. I couldn't ever drop more than 3 pins completely off the table. Oh, maybe 4 or 5 times.
A few shooters, (out of about 24) were regularly smashing those pins off the table. The two most prominent were (1) Dick S., after approx. 8 weeks, only missing 2, that's (two) pins off the table. He was using a older modified S & W 1911. I don't remember the exact model #. I'll have to ask him when this Corvid thing is over. (2) The other
person Ray J., (2nd place) had an older S&W revolver in .357, using 180 grain Missouri cast bullets, with about 5.2 grains of TiteGroup powder (approx. 980 fps).
Within 2 weeks after using the 686, I started shooting 4 out of 5 pins, and on the 3rd week, I started shooting so many more pins off the table, I couldn't believe it. The 5" length is absolutely the best balance of these heavy revolvers.
So, a few months later, I went out and bought a brand new GP100, with 7 rounds, and 6 inch barrel. It actually looks prettier than the S&W brand. But, after a couple of rounds at the range with a friend and cousin, we all thought that the S&W was a better made pistol. We couldn't shoot the GP100 as well as the 686.
That being said, we went through about 2 years worth of my gun mags.
(Guns & Ammo, Gun World, Guns, American Hand gunner, Gun Test magazine, Firearms News, Shooting Times, Ballistic Best, etc.) to look at/check out various comparison reviews.
In summary, S&W seems to have an edge over time, but many of the most recent information showed us that there are tons of shooters that prefer Ruger. And then, there a tons that prefer S&W. The handle on the Ruger GP100 definitely has a bigger handprint. I have relatively small hands, and I'm actually going to sell my GP100, not because it's not a good revolver, but, the handprint is just too large for my hands. I also couldn't shoot it as well as the 686. In all fairness, I only shot about 150 rounds through it. But, I knew at that time, it wasn't the revolver for me.
Interestingly enough, most of the magazines gave both about a 50/50 review. The 2018 issue of gun test magazine gave the "gun of the year" award to the GP100, if you can believe it. But, I'll stick with my 686.
Dick
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
57 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Thank you for sharing your experiences Dick. It's posts like that which make threads like this worth it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
I sold my Ruger SS 3".

Have considered getting a 6", would prefer a 5".

Have been a 586/685 fan, since the L frame was introduced. Never owned one, always wanted one, still do. Prefer the 5". Found a gorgeous 686 6" 7 shot, I should have bought, but was looking for something else, at that time and convinced myself to pass.

Can't go wrong with either one, but I give the 686 a slight edge, because of the grip, as mentioned above. I like the S&W grip, it fits my hand better.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
220 Posts
I have the GP-100 in 4". It is a great gun and I love it. In comparing it to the 686. It has its strong features of a beautiful and very strong gun even with the heavy trigger. The trigger can be worked on but that is nothing in my opinion. It is the gun its self. Also, the GP-100 was built for the .357 magnum and will run many thousands of rounds. The only edge the 686 has over the GP-100 is a lighter trigger. I look at it this way, Blond or Brunet?

What are your thoughts of the Redhawk vs the 629?

I've been wanting to buy a .44 magnum but can't decide if the 629 is as strong as the Redhawk.
I definitely like the looks of the 629 with a 6" full underlug barrel.

Is the Redhawk a better gun than the 629? Would the 629 last heavy shooting?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
I have the GP-100 in 4". It is a great gun and I love it. In comparing it to the 686. It has its strong features of a beautiful and very strong gun even with the heavy trigger. The trigger can be worked on but that is nothing in my opinion. It is the gun its self. Also, the GP-100 was built for the .357 magnum and will run many thousands of rounds. The only edge the 686 has over the GP-100 is a lighter trigger. I look at it this way, Blond or Brunet?

What are your thoughts of the Redhawk vs the 629?

I've been wanting to buy a .44 magnum but can't decide if the 629 is as strong as the Redhawk.
I definitely like the looks of the 629 with a 6" full underlug barrel.

Is the Redhawk a better gun than the 629? Would the 629 last heavy shooting?
My hunting buddy has an early '70s Model 29, yes, it will hold up to heavy shooting.
His B-I-L has an early production Redhawk. He would say it is every bit as good.

Can't go wrong with either.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
220 Posts
Thanks C. D., more and more I am inclined to buy the 629. I also like the Red hawk but I think the 629 looks better with the full underlug barrel. Knowing that the 629 will hold up to years of shooting magnums only helps me decide.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Consider changing the main spring down a few pounds. This and some break in time will improve the trigger getting you closer to the S&W trigger. I'd guess that's where the difference lies.
Best,
Rob
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
Of you want a seven shot, I'd go with the 686. Some seven shot GPs have been problematic.
Interesting
Have heard nothing of GP100 problems.
Why would a 7 shot be problematic and a 6 shot not?

Personally, I prefer the 686, but it has nothing to do with thinking the GP100 is inferior or problematic.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
220 Posts
Of you want a seven shot, I'd go with the 686. Some seven shot GPs have been problematic.
Interesting. I can't think of any reason a 6 shot vs a 7 shot GP-100 would be so different the 7 shot experiencing problems.
Do you think it maybe do to having an extra cylinder for a 7th round would cause problems?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
Interesting. I can't think of any reason a 6 shot vs a 7 shot GP-100 would be so different the 7 shot experiencing problems.
Do you think it maybe do to having an extra cylinder for a 7th round would cause problems?

No reason

The Single-Six and Single-Seven .327 are no different

An SP101 is a 5-shot.

.22LR comes as a 6 shot, 9 shot, 10 shot
No problems

Makes no sense. If there are problems, what are the problems. Otherwise, it's bad grapes
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
27 Posts
Rob pretty much summed it up about the 7 shot GP issue. I'll stick to the 6 shot GPs rather than take a chance of an ammo finicky revolver for the sake of an extra round. Do a search and you'll find more than a few had this problem. The 7 shot 686 doesn't.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
220 Posts
I understand some of the Russian ammo may be the cause, such as the one with steel cases, (Tulammo). I have not experienced any problems loading but have had minor issues unloading, the cases stick to the cylinder.
As for the 7 round cylinder, it may be that the cylinder needs one or two thousands of an inch opening or in depth. If it is due to ammo only, it just may be the brand of ammo and not the gun.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27 Posts
I dont do risky steel ammo

Ammo problem, not a gun problem.
GP100 is a "white cop" being blamed for exceptional quality ammo.
I'm not bashing GPs, I own two 6 shot which are great guns. If you search another forum I won't mention (use your imagination) they're are 8 pages that go into detail about it. It boils down to the OD of some brands case heads not having enough space between them and binding.I'm not talking about steel cases ammo. I won't further derail this thread just search "GP100 7 shot not fixed yet" . Personally, I wouldn't want to spend $700-800 on a revolver that won't shoot the same ammo without binding (causing ejection problems) as my 6 shot GP.
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top